When it comes to personalised service and flexibility, building societies often outshine their high street counterparts. While big banks rely heavily on impersonal algorithms, building societies—with their more manual underwriting processes—take a closer look at individual circumstances.
This makes them particularly appealing for complex cases or self-employed clients. But as charming as these institutions are, there are gaps in their armour, notably in branding and technology.
Let’s explore the unique advantages of building societies and the areas where they could improve to better serve their communities.
The Human Touch in Financial Services:
One of the standout qualities of building societies is their ability to offer a bespoke approach to financial services. Unlike larger banks, which often funnel customers through rigid, automated systems, building societies retain the human element in decision-making. This is particularly beneficial for:
Self-employed individuals: Whose income streams may not fit into traditional lending models.
Complex cases: Such as unique property purchases or non-standard credit histories.
This personalized touch fosters a sense of trust and approachability, attributes that are increasingly rare in modern finance.
Room for Improvement:
Despite their strengths, building societies are not without their flaws. Many of these institutions lack a strong digital presence and rely on outdated online tools. In a world where convenience is king, this can alienate younger, tech-savvy borrowers.
What could change?
Increase digital platforms: User-friendly apps and efficient online processes could make their services more accessible.
Stronger branding: A focused PR strategy highlighting their community-driven ethos and customer-centric benefits could help them stand out in a crowded market.
Awareness: The Silent Hurdle:
While building societies are seen as community-oriented and approachable, many smaller societies struggle with visibility. Potential clients often base their choices solely on competitive rates rather than the unique values a society might bring.
The Fix:
Education through storytelling: Sharing real-life examples of how their flexible processes have helped customers could create a stronger emotional connection.
Local engagement: Participating in community events and initiatives can foster loyalty beyond just competitive interest rates.
Why It Matters:
In an era of increasingly automated services, the personalised approach of building societies feels refreshingly different.
However, to remain relevant, these institutions must evolve—support technology while retaining their human-first ethos. With the right mix of innovation and tradition, building societies can secure their place as both a trusted financial partner and a modern competitor.
Final Thoughts:
Building societies have carved out a niche in the financial world by focusing on what matters most: people. But to truly thrive, they must pair their bespoke service with the convenience of modern technology. By doing so, they can attract a broader audience while staying true to their roots.
For those seeking financial services with a human touch, building societies remain a compelling choice. And with a bit of rebranding and technological uplift, they could very well become the financial institutions of the future.
Comments